A portfolio you can see, not a docket you hope someone is reading.
Every asset with its type, status and jurisdiction; every application with its filing dates and what they trigger; every office action with its response clock running where the matter lives — and a portfolio view that shows which deadline is nearest across the whole book.
- Quick answer
- What is the best IP portfolio management software for law firms?
- Sapphire Legal is Private Legal Intelligence for intellectual property practice: a per-tenant platform holding an asset registry across trademarks, patents and copyrights, each with its type, status and jurisdiction. Applications are tracked with their filing dates and the deadlines those dates create, office actions are managed with their response windows and status, and a portfolio-level overview shows where every asset stands at once rather than one record at a time. Drafting runs from the firm’s own templates and is prepared ahead. Everything runs in an isolated database and a private model environment per firm, which matters while an application is unpublished and the invention is still a secret.
The deadline is the practice, and it never arrives as a surprise — only as a miss.
IP prosecution is a long sequence of dates that are entirely knowable in advance and catastrophic to miss. A missed office action response can abandon an application; a missed renewal can lose a registered mark that a business has built on for a decade. Nothing about the work is urgent until it is terminal, which is precisely why it is the practice most dependent on a system rather than on attention, and the practice where a spreadsheet failure does the most damage.
Deadlines live in a docket nobody owns continuously
Response windows, renewal dates and national-phase deadlines are known the day they are created, but a docket is only as good as the person reading it this week — and the consequence of a gap is abandonment rather than inconvenience.
Portfolio state is invisible asset by asset
A client with forty marks across nine jurisdictions has a portfolio shape — what is registered, what is pending, what is contested, what is lapsing — that cannot be seen by opening records one at a time.
Office action history is scattered across correspondence
What was rejected, what was argued, what was amended and what finally worked is the firm’s accumulated prosecution knowledge, and it usually lives in an email thread rather than on the asset.
Assets with status, deadlines with consequence.
The registry is the spine: applications, office actions and renewals all hang off the asset rather than off a matter number.
Each asset enters the registry with its type, its jurisdiction and its current status, so the question "where does this mark stand in Canada" is answerable from the record. Applications are tracked with their filing dates and the deadlines those dates create, and office actions are managed as items with their own response windows and status rather than as correspondence someone has to remember to act on. Because everything hangs off the asset rather than off a matter number, the portfolio overview can show the whole book at once — which asset is lapsing, which response is closest, which jurisdiction is quiet. Responses and filings are drafted from the firm’s own templates and prepared ahead, exportable to Word, with any missing input named rather than guessed. For counsel carrying several client companies, the same portfolio view rolls up across all of them.
- 1
Asset registry across types and jurisdictions
Trademarks, patents and copyrights are recorded with type, jurisdiction and status as structured fields, so portfolio questions are answerable without opening each record.
- 2
Application tracking from filing
Filing dates are captured and the deadlines they create are tracked against the asset, not against someone’s calendar.
- 3
Office actions as managed items
Each action carries its response window and status, so an outstanding response is a visible state rather than an email that needs remembering.
- 4
Prosecution history kept on the asset
What was rejected, argued and amended stays with the asset, which is what turns prosecution experience into firm knowledge rather than individual memory.
- 5
Portfolio-level overview
The whole book is visible at once — what is pending, contested or lapsing — rather than one asset at a time.
- 6
Responses drafted ahead
Filings and responses are drafted from the firm’s own templates and waiting, exportable to Word. Anything built from unverified work says so on its first page.
What ships with the IP pack
The IP module is the primary workflow on this deployment, not a matter type with a label on it.
- IP asset registry with type, status and jurisdiction
- Application tracking with filing dates and deadlines
- Office action management and response tracking
- Prosecution history kept on the asset
- Portfolio-level status overview across the whole book
- Cross-portfolio view for counsel carrying several clients
- Document drafting from your own templates
- Conflict checking across every client and asset on intake
An unpublished application is a trade secret until it is not.
Why private infrastructure matters hereBefore publication, an application describes an invention the client has not disclosed to anyone — and a firm frequently holds filings for companies competing in the same field. That material must not pass through a shared model. Each client firm on Sapphire Legal gets its own database and its own document storage, and the AI runs inside Sapphire Legal’s own AWS account rather than routing to an outside provider. Nothing trains a model and nothing crosses between firms, because the data never shares a home to begin with.
Where to go next
The IP pack is one part of the platform. These are the pieces around it.
Intellectual property practice questions.
- Is this a docketing system?
- It tracks applications, office action response windows and renewal dates against the asset, and surfaces what is nearest across the portfolio. Be precise about one limit: the statutory-basis display — a deadline shown with the rule that created it — covers corporate, family and fiduciary matters, so IP dates are tracked without that rule citation. Confirm the fit against your docketing requirements during a demo.
- Does it handle trademarks, patents and copyrights together?
- The registry covers all three, each recorded with its type, jurisdiction and status, so a mixed portfolio is one book rather than three systems.
- How are office actions managed?
- Each one is a tracked item with its own response window and status rather than correspondence someone has to remember to act on, and the prosecution history stays on the asset so what was rejected, argued and amended becomes firm knowledge.
- Can we see a whole client portfolio at once?
- Yes — that is what the portfolio-level overview is for. What is pending, contested or lapsing is visible across the book rather than one record at a time, and counsel carrying several client companies get the same roll-up across all of them.
- Is an unpublished application safe on this platform?
- Each client firm runs on its own database and its own document storage, and the AI executes inside Sapphire Legal’s own AWS account rather than calling OpenAI, Anthropic or any outside provider. Filings are never used to train a model, never retained by an AI vendor, and never pooled with another firm’s data.
- Does it file with the registries directly?
- It prepares the work — drafted responses and filings from your own templates, waiting and exportable to Word — and tracks what is due. Filing itself remains the firm’s action, and nothing leaves the platform without an attorney approving it.
See it on a real portfolio.
Bring a client book — the marks, the jurisdictions, the responses you are carrying — and we will walk what the platform would be tracking and what it would be telling you is closest.
14-day free trial. No card required.